Friday, September 12, 2008

Summary of Lesson II

Well, Lesson Two has come and gone and below is a synopsis of Chapters 2,3, & 4 of the USCCA Study "Four Pillars of Faith." Before we do, the review to yesterday's lesson reflected the Trinitarian nature of the Catholic Faith. John Paul II oft used phrase Totus Tuus ego sum, "I am totally yours" reflects the nature of the Divine Persons of the Trinity in relation to each other, a total and complete self-giving to each other in infinite love. The Trinity's desire is for us, we humans, to enjoy forever the unity they enjoy. The Trinity is inviting us into their Totus tuus, a covenantal bond with us through Jesus Christ, who says to us, "I am totally yours."

Chapter Two: God reveals himself in covenant, a covenant that forms a family bond between himself and his human creatures. The Bible has six main covenants God made with humanity, each building on each other until the final covenant, Jesus and His Church, a covenant that fulfills all the previous coventants. He doesn't destroy these previous coventants, but fulfills them. His love is entire and complete and covenantal, a bond that makes an exchange of persons, and this Trinitarian self-giving is the basis of God's revelation. He desires to love us and gives himself entirely to us, and in return, requires that we give of ourselves entirely to Him. The conditions of self-giving must be mutual. Though God gives of himself entirely to us, if we refuse to respond accordingly, we break covenant with Him. This is why the phrase "unconditional love" should never be used of God's love for us; it distorts the covenantal nature of God's love and the mutual self-giving that is the condition for this love exchange. "Unconditional Love" really allows the perception that there are loop holes in our response to God. "Unconditional Love" should ONLY describe our loving response to God...a response that is unconditional, total self-giving on our part. This is a trinitarian response on our part.

Let's face it folks, if we are going to be in unity with the Holy Trinity forever in eternal bliss, we must begin to act out the life God is pouring into us!

Chapter Three: This chapter gets more lively, in that it shows us how the Word of God is transmitted AND interpreted, lively in that we as human beings like to be in charge of our lives, and interpret reality that best fits what we want out of life. What makes the Catholic faith so transformative is that it is the life of the Trinity that begins to animate our life. There is nothing that we can do naturally to live out this life, and there is no right given to us to redefine who Jesus is, or what He expects from us. Anything other than what Jesus describes and teaches is a false Catholicism.

The Word of God according to the Catholic Church is both Sacred Tradition And Sacred Scripture. The two cannot be separated but function as a whole. Reason being, you cannot read or understand scripture without an interpretation. And since interpretation is an act of the mind, we need the mind of Christ to help us understand God's Word correctly. The perfect illustration is the "Road to Emmaus" discourse, where to followers of Christ were sadly leaving Jerusalem for Emmaus, lamenting the failure of Jesus Christ, having been crucified just a couple of days prior. Jesus, who appears to the men, walks along side of them conversing about the previous events that last Friday. The two men did not recognize Jesus. Jesus corrected their gloomy outlook by explaining the Scriptures, from the beginning of Genesis through the prophets. And the two men's hearts burned within them.

Jesus Christ was interpreting the Scriptures with HIS understanding of them. The Scripture is explained in and with the mind of Christ. It is here that we must understand that this is how the role of the Church's Magesterium plays out in our life. In the name of Christ, and with His mind, the Church teaches the Scriptures to us with the understanding of Christ. The only True interpreter of Scripture is Jesus Christ. It is never, EVER left to individual Christians to decide for themselves who Jesus is, or what He means by what He says. To do so is to invite heresy, a term which means "to choose for oneself."

Private interpretation that deviates from the authority of Christ is virulent and pervasive in the Church today, among both Protestants AND Catholics. Protestantism, as a movement, prides itself of the right and freedom of private interpretation with the doctrine of Sola Scriptura (SS)which holds that the Scripture ALONE is the final infallible authority of faith and morals. But as we discussed above, interpretation is always involved in the reading and studying of Scripture, because reading and studying requires a mind. What SS really does is it cloaks human authority as infallible, saying that the views expressed are "backed by scripture." Who can argue with the Bible? So the Bible is espoused but human authority is the source, and this doctrine then, becomes a principle of division. You can bet that when there is any division in the Church, there is a human authority that is vaunting itself as Christ, destroying the precious unity that is to be a hallmark of Christ's followers, a unity that expresses THE ultimate unity of the Trinity.

In dealing with a small minority of Protestants who are anti-Catholic, we Catholics need to know the real issue at hand. If we are approached aggressively by these type of people, remember that we do not need to answer their questions that are devised to cause doubt in our lives. The challenges they pose is based on a human authority somewhere in their lives. WE ARE UNDER NO OBLIGATION TO SUCCUMB TO THIS AUTHORITY. It is a false authority.

All questions that aim at us trying to prove our doctrines from the Bible reverses the nature of Scripture and the authority of the Church. Remember, the Church precedes the Scriptures, the Bible is the Catholic Church's book. To stand upon the written Word of God is to stand with and under the authority of the Catholic Church. You do NOT have to prove from Scripture why we believe what we believe. We believe it because the authority of the Church beckons us to do so. The anti-Catholic has to show why they can privately interpret, and show us where they get this authority. They will NEVER be able to do this, which leads to greater frustration for them. The best thing to do is to push the onus of proof onto the anti-catholic to prove their right to privately interpret. Don't bother getting into Bible sword play. It's a waste of time and you'll be frustrated.

A word about difficult areas of teaching...sometimes we face some king-size boulders in the soil of our souls. Whether it be because we were told to be conciliatory to keep the peace by others over us in authority, or if you are just plain afraid of confrontation, if you give in to the attacks of those who wish to proseltyze you into the Protestant faith, then you need to do some soul searching. We are, in charity, supposed to love everyone around us as brothers and sisters, even our enemies. When an anti-Catholic attacks your Catholic faith, you must, IN LOVE, oppose his or her tactics. For confounding and destroying the tactics they use on you will not only save you from doubt, but will show these dear committed folks that the Catholic faith is no wimpy faith. It can withstand the very gates of hell. Don't wimp out and concede to these people! Follow the example of Jesus; do what he did and stand up to them in love! Be loving, but be tough!

Chapter Three: This section can be summed up as follows: our only adequate response is faith, which works through obedience. We cannot prove the existence of God, we cannot come up with ANY scientific means to know why we believe is revelation; reason must take a back seat to faith. Faith is not resistant to reason and is friends with it. But reason must never rule, Faith rules. All faith in God submits to the authority of God in the Church. It never deviates from this. Why? As the Baltimore Catechism defines faith: "Catholic faith believes everything the Church teaches without doubt, for it is impossible for God to be deceived or to deceive."

Lesson Three for next week: Read Chapters six, seven and eight. It looks to be wonderful, fast moving expose of the heart of the Gospel dealing with the topics of Creation, the Fall and sin, and the sacrifice of Jesus to restore humanity. Don't miss this one if you can; it lays the foundation of the Catholic Gospel we are to be proclaiming!

11 comments:

Mom of Six said...

Dear beggar,
I do not like confrontation...and usuallly the people in my life who confront my husband and me about our faith do so with little jabs here and there. (or they will make jokes about being Catholic or especially the number of children we have in front of other people)
We have decided to let our life speak to them without words and arguments. But...I have to admit that sometimes that is a very difficult thing to do.
On a different subject...I cannot stop thinking about when you said, "You are Christ's Beloved." It was toward the beginning of the evening. Thank you for getting me to take the time to slow down my busy life and think more about God. All day today it has been on my mind.

Anonymous said...

Mom of 6:

You are very welcome!

As to confrontation, perhaps you are wise not to get into tit-for-tat jabs with these folks. I think we have to weigh the outcomes of even having conversations with those who have no desire to learn of the Catholic faith. But, if you are in a situation where they confront you, it's good to have a good idea of the nature of SS, the nature of questions and how they create doubt, and to know exactly where to find their false premise.

They probably won't jab you again, although they may not talk to you again. So it may mean turning our verbal cheek. I do that at times, but more times than not, I'm willing to engage them. Makes for interesting discussion and the possibility of planting seeds.

Thanks for dropping by again!

Mom of Six said...

Problem is that it has been happening since my husband joined the Catholic faith in 1992. And...the comments happen every Holiday and get together that we have with family. They don't question anything...they just cut and make quick comments.
Okay, I just wanted to clarify things a bit. Makes things a bit more complicated, doesn't it? We continue to love and smile. As we learn more about being Catholic, we are better at responses. (when they are necessary) SS has never come up before with them. I really don't think they know enough about their own faith to even know about that. Our belief in the Eucharist comes up every now and then...and the Pope.

Thanks for listening again. :)

Anonymous said...

It's sad when people are disrespectful towards us in our beliefs, especially with relatives. If you think the time is ripe, or if they are willing, you can always ask them a question to clarify. For instance, if someone makes a statement about how they would never let any Pope in Rome tell them what to do, you can counter with the question, "Which Pope do you follow?" They may be taken back by that and say, "I have the Holy Spirit leading me," or something like that. If they give you enough information, you can then offer to fill them in what the Catholic Faith really teaches that pertains to their statement and see if they are interested. Could you tell me a common jab your relatives give you and your hubby? Maybe we could role play this out for a teachable moment!

JAB

Anonymous said...

Oh, and I might add, don't be sarcastic. That just creates trouble.

MoonLight83 said...

I've always wrestled with the concept of unconditional love and am glad you brought this up. I understood unconditional love to be God's total love for us, without conditions, no strings attached. Yes, we are always free to accept God's love and respond lovingly to God and we are free to respond in a way we feel is better for us, usually contrary to God's love. Regardless of what we choose, God's love is constant. Isn't that constant love of God unconditional love? We should similarly respond unconditionally to God but our human nature gets in the way. Can you explain again why we should not use the term unconditional love to describe God's love for us.

Mom of Six said...

I left a comment and then deleted it because it got too long and I don't want to take space away from Moonlight's question.
If you could go to my blog and find August 19,2007 with the Sunday Gospel and an entry titled,"Inlaws and Family Harmony" I think you will understand.
I have a problem of being tongue tied at the moment they comment because they catch you off guard and then later I think of a response. Just me I guess.

Anonymous said...

Mom:

I'll go to the website in a bit. But, regarding the term "unconditional love", at best, the term is confusing, which is not good when trying to communicate the Gospel. "Unconditional" means Without conditions", and so the question then is, "Does God love us without conditions?"

One could say yes, since the Lord loves us with an infinite and incomprehensible love that is deep and mysterious. It is beyond reason. It is never ending. These sentences makes sense, but to say God loves us without condition leaves room to equivocate, or to have more than one meaning. Being an expert in human nature, as I have one :), I see it as common for us to define this with loopholes.

Where "unconditional love" fails is when we look at God's love in terms of "covenant". God has revealed himself throughout salvation history as desiring and requiring an intense and complete response to him that is totally self-giving. Even Christ, in the book of Revelation, told the Ephesian Church that they needed to repent and return to their "first love", a love that is intense, pure and sacrificial which they had in the beginning.

In my opinion, much of the lukewarmness in the Church is due to the lack of urgency to response in kind to Christ with the same self-giving He gives to us on the cross and in the Mass. "God loves us unconditionally", which means that no matter what we do, we can always expect God to love us. The comfort we get from this idea may be genuine, but it also may pacify and even downplay the necessity of having any passionate loving response to Him.

Since words mean things, I want to use the terminology that best describe God's love. "Unconditional love" is too problematic.

Anonymous said...

Moonlight:

Did my answer to Mom of six answer your question?

No doubt God's love is unfailing, never ending, complete, beyond comprehension, life giving, free, etc. God's love is gift. God loves even his enemies and causes the sun and rain to fall on those who curse Him. Doesn't mean they'll be in covenant with Him, sharing in his Trinitarian life, or will be with him in heaven forever. His enemies will be condemned forever. Certainly NOT the idea that is usually associated with "unconditional love."

I say, let's avoid using terms that equivocate. Let's use words and sentences that are precise, powerful and leave no room "to wiggle."

MoonLight83 said...

Yes, I'm beginning to see your point. As sinners, each of us continually breaks our covenant with God. Thankfully God continually calls us to share in his Trinitarian life. Our response to God's call must be a genuine conversion of heart as we repent and God restores the covenant we broke.

Anonymous said...

moonlight:

It will take a lifetime to understand the depth of the covenant God has with us, and what is to be our response.

As to the phrase "unconditional love", I want to remind that it is a phrase that should be avoided. However, I noticed in the USCCA book on page 99 in the "Meditation", that the phrase is used there. It has the sense we have been trying to formulate here.

Thanks for jumping in, Moonlight83! It's great having you on board!

Justanotherbeggar